Back To Top

 7-Zip Benchmark: Intel Core i9-13900K 60% Faster Compared To 12900K

7-Zip Benchmark: Intel Core i9-13900K 60% Faster Compared To 12900K

i9 12th 13900k, achieved 126 MB/s in the compression test with a file size of 384 MB and 3847 MB in 7-Zip, and roughly 1630 MB/s in the decompression test with the same file sizes. Although both parts had compression speeds of 513 MB/s, the Raptor Lake component was significantly faster at 150 MB/s. With files measuring 5130MB and 51300MB, it completed the decompression test at a rate of 2600MB/s.

It means the i9-13900K is 20% more efficient at compression and 60% more efficient at decompression. Almost all file compression and decompression methods are quite CPU heavy, which explains the large increases for the 13900K. We don’t know how 7-Zip interacts with Intel’s hybrid architecture specifically.


Core i9-13900K Core i9-12900K
Compression 151MB/s 126MB/s
Decompression 2600MB/s 1638MB/s


The doubling of efficiency cores with Raptor Lake is a prime suspect in this performance increase. Since compression and decompression can scale to a large number of cores, typically 32 to 48 cores are used at their peak. The 13900K’s total number of cores is 24, comprised of 16 efficiency (E) cores and 8 performance (P) cores. In addition, the 13900K’s boost rates above 5.5 GHz on the P cores provide a welcome boost.

i9 12th 13900k

Intel’s 12th Gen Alder Lake processors will be succeeded by the 13th Gen Raptor Lake chip architecture. The chips, which will be manufactured using an improved Intel 7 process and have P cores clocked at over 5.5GHz, will be twice as efficient as their predecessors in the SKUs that are compatible with them.


Desktop Central Processing Unit (CPU) Performance Between Intel’s 12th Generation Alder Lake-S and 13th Generation Raptor Lake-S (Initial):


Intel 12th Gen Alder Lake-S & 13th Gen Raptor Lake-S Desktop CPU Comparison (Preliminary):

Intel Core i9-13900K 8 16 24 / 32 3.0 / 5.8 GHz 5.5 GHz (All-Core) TBD / 4.7 GHz 4.3 GHz (All-Core) 68 MB 125W (PL1)

250W (PL2)?

Intel Core i9-12900K 8 8 16 / 24 3.2 / 5.2 GHz 4.9 GHz (All Core) 2.4 / 3.9 GHz 3.7 GHz (All Core) 30 MB 125W (PL1)

241W (PL2)

$599 US
Intel Core i7-13700K 8 8 16 / 24 3.4 / 5.4 GHz 5.3 GHz (All Core) 3.4 / 4.3 GHz TBA 54 MB 125W (PL1)

228W (PL2)?

Intel Core i7-12700K 8 4 12 / 20 3.6 / 5.0 GHz 4.7 GHz (All Core) 2.7 / 3.8 GHz 3.6 GHz (All Core) 25 MB 125W (PL1)

190W (PL2)

$419 US
Intel Core i5-13600K 6 8 14 / 20 3.5 / 5.2 GHz 5.1 GHz (All-Core) 3.5 / 3.9 GHz TBA 44 MB 125W (PL1)

180W (PL2)?

Intel Core i5-12600K 6 4 10 / 16 3.7 / 4.9 GHz 4.5 GHz (All Core) 2.8 / 3.6 GHz 3.4 GHz (All Core) 20 MB 125W (PL1)

150W (PL2)

$299 US

The lister claims the Intel Core i9-13900K CPU engineering sample is fully compatible with the ASUS Z690 APEX motherboard, overclocks well, and can run games, however we find this hard to believe in the absence of any supporting evidence. Chips with the new Intel logo and obscured labelling indicate that AVX-512 has been deactivated, as detailed in this article. The 12th generation Alder Lake CPUs share the same logo as their predecessors. 

i9 12th 13900k

For a short time, the sample was available for 2850 RMB, or $426 US, which is less than the suggested retail price of the Core i9-12900K. In general, Engineering samples don’t go for cheap, but since this one has already been sold, we may never find out what it is or how well it operates. We can only speculate as to whether or not the buyer will share his chip’s performance metrics on Chinese technology discussion boards. Such samples should be avoided, as chips with this early a release of ES typically have significant BIOS bugs and stability issues. These chips are not the same quality as the ones sold in stores. Existing LGA 1700/1800 socketed platforms with support for DDR5 and DDR4 RAM will be able to run the upcoming Intel 13th Gen Raptor Lake Desktop CPUs when they arrive later this year.

Intel Core i9-11900K vs i9-10900K

There is now an Intel Core i9-11900k processor available for purchase.

The i9-predecessor, 10900k’s the i9-10900k, was released in 2020, so it isn’t old hat.

Core i9-11900k and Core i9-10900k processor prices

The official pricing of the i9-11900k is $539. The official UK price has not been announced by Intel, although Overclockers lists it at £559.99.

At launch, the i9-10900k cost £530, but it is now available for as little as £407/$409, depending on where you shop. This lowers the price by almost £100 compared to the 11th Generation model.

Deal: Just £448.29 (a savings of $122.38) for an Intel Core i9 10900K CPU

Comparing the i9-11900k with i9-10900k processors in terms of performance

Due to Intel’s continued reliance on the 14nm manufacturing process, the enhancements available to the Intel Core i9-11900K are limited. The i9-11900k has a lower base clock speed of 3.5GHz than the i9-10900k, but both processors have the same maximum clock speed.

I9-10900k has 10 core and 20 threaded, and the i9-11900k had 8 core and 16 threaded. This is a noticeable downgrade this year. Basic productivity is unaffected, however the flagship CPU’s performance may be restricted in creative apps. You might be tempted to think that Intel’s new Rocket Lake architecture isn’t much better than the i9-11900k, but we’ll get to that in the next section.

  • Cores \sThreads
  • The fundamental frequency of the clock (GHz)
  • Increased clock frequency (GHz)
  • TDP
  • Smart Cache from Intel
  • 20MB L3 Cache Intel Core i9-10900K 10/20/3.7/5.3/125W (Kaby Lake)
  • A 16-core Intel Core i9-11900K processor with 16MB of L3 cache.

Benchmarking Intel Core i9-11900k vs the Core i9-10900k

The Rocket Lake design is largely responsible for the performance boosts discovered in the Intel Core i9-11900k, which makes it the more potent of the two processors in our tests.

These include 19 percent more Instructions Per Cycle (IPU) than the Comet Lake CPUs, as well as new capabilities such as PC Express 4.0 support. As a result, the maximum speed of supported SSDs has been doubled, reducing loading times for both games and data transfers.

Intel Deep Learning Boost for DDR4-3200, Resizable BAR, and additional overclocking capabilities round out the list of enhancements.

Larger Performance

Here’s a quick look at our benchmark results: Extensive version of PCMark 10.

Generally speaking, PCMark 10 is an excellent benchmark score. The Intel Core i9-11900K takes the lead in this comparison, demonstrating the benefits of the new Rocket Lake architecture, as can be seen.

R23 of Cinebench

For artistic applications, Cinebench R23 is an excellent benchmark tool. When it came to multi-core performance, the i9-10900K chip took first place, but the 11th Gen Intel CPU had the upper hand.

This is what happens when Intel reduces the number of cores and threads in their newest chips. AMD’s Ryzen processors, on the other hand, are a better bet for multimedia creators.

Intel Graphics Card with ACM-G10

4K Time Spy by 3DMark

The 3DMark Time Spy test provides a broad picture of game efficiency. If you’re looking for a realistic picture of in-game benchmark performance, this result should serve as a good starting point.

There are only a few frames-per-second differences between the 1oth and 11th generation Intel processors, thus you’re unlikely to notice a significant difference in performance in real time.

When it comes to performance, which is better?

Aside from multi-threaded benchmarking, the intel core i9-11900k 8-core 3.5ghz  is the most powerful processor due to the Rocket Lake architecture.

Even yet, the performance improvement between generations is not sufficient to warrant the i9-10900replacement. K’s For PCIe 4.0 support, the only practical reason to update is to get the latest SSDs as soon as possible.

With the best possible gaming experience, go for the i9-11900k. The i9-10900K, on the other hand, delivers equivalent performance at a reduced price.

Also Read:

Intel benchmarks show Arc A750 GPU beating an RTX 3060

Here is the Intel 12th Gen CPU List Revealed: Everything You Have to Know

Alienware new monitor 2022 Have A Built-In Headphone Hanger

Zoom’s latest update on Mac includes a fix for a dangerous security flaw

i9 12th 13900k


Q1: How much does the 13900K cost?

Sample of Intel’s 24-core Raptor Lake Core i9-13900K CPU, which will soon be available for purchase in China for about $426 USD, is shown. Intel’s 13th generation Raptor Lake CPU lineup will be led by the Core i9-13900K. It’s possible that an even speedier variant called “KS” will appear, allowing for clock rates of up to 6 GHz, but such news will have to wait.

Q2: Is the i9-12900K a good gaming processor?

The Intel Core i9-12900KS outperforms or is on par with its competitors on every game we tested it on, with the exception of Assassin’s Creed Valhalla, where the Intel Core i5-12400F performed incredibly well (I’ve repeated the tests and confirmed that this is indeed the case).

Q3: Whether or not the i9 has been updated to the twelfth generation?

The Intel Core i9-12900KS, the company’s newest and fastest desktop processor, has just been released. The 12900KS, with speeds up to 5.5 GHz, sets a new standard for desktop video game and content production computers.

Q4: Is Z690 compatible with the 13900K processor?

The image of the Raptor Lake CPU lacks its CPU SPEC code and QR codes. However the seller guarantees compatibility with the ASUS ROG Z690 APEX motherboard. Given that it is a next-generation 13900K chip, the price of around $426 (2850 RMB) is a deal.

Q5: Does the 12900K get hot to the touch?

Even though I’m employing a 360mm AIO. Even if the 12900K gets warm, I think you could get some better temperatures with some tweaking of vcore and the like.

Jennie Marquez

Jennie Marquez

Jennie is a Staff writer, contributor and has been writing about tech for over a decade. Jennie’s work at trendblog is to specialize in phones and tablets, but she also takes on other tech like electric scooters, smartwatches, fitness, mobile gaming and more. She is based in London, UK.
Prev Post

Ways In Which a Business Can Benefit from Instagram Data Scraping

Next Post

Samsung m7 review: Is it Worth to buy it


Leave a Comment